|
|
One of last years greatest surprises was the removal of Hydatellaceae from Poales to Nymphaeales. It might not sound grand, but since Poales is the group of monocots that the grasses, sedges, rushs (and pineapples!) are a part of, and the Nymphaeales are the water lilies, the magnitude of the transfer of this small family of minute, sedge-like aquatics is so more impressing. And even more interesting since the Nymphaeales is one of the prime suspects for the sistership to the rest of the flowering plants! The implication of all this is simply that Hydatellaceae migh be the one of the missing keys needed to solve Darwin’s “abominable mystery“, the grand origin of flowers and flowering plants themselves! When DNA sequences first was used in large scale to resolve evolutionary relationships among plants, the big surprise then was finding the hornwort family, Ceratophyllaceae, at the very base of the Angiosperm tree of life. Soon however, the hornworts lost their isolated position outside all the other Angiosperms, and was replaced by a virtually unknown and thoroughly neglected small shrub from New Caledonia, the now famous Amborella trichopoda. Amborella has since then as best as it can defended its position as sister to the rest of the flowering plants, but what can be ask for from a shrub? From time to time its sistership has been challenged, but no obvious candidate has turned up. One of the challengers have however been Nymphaeales, either alone or together with Amborella, but already small changes in parameters or data sets have restored Amborella as the sole sister. And we are still waiting for the definitive analysis that will show us with high confidence what the basal relationships are. In the meantime, we need to see what the traditional data sets can tell us about the evolution. One possible large step forward was presented in the last issue of Nature, in the paper “Hydatellaceae are water lilies with gymnospermous tendencies” by William Friedman of University of Colorado (Nature 1 May 2008, vol. 453: 94-97). Here Friedman describe the embryology of the female gametophyte (the structure harboring the egg cells and, after fertilization, forms the seed). Not surprisingly, now when we are pretty certain that Hydatellaceae are “water lilies” (albeit seemingly sedgy ones), much of the embryological features correspond to the other water lilies (the female gametophyte of the water lilies and the likewise early-branching Austrobaileyales have a development not found in most other angiosperms, including Amborella), but Hydatellaceae have an additional feature unique among flowering plants: the allocation of nutrients (starch) to the embryo-nourishing tissue prior to the fertilization! All other flowering plants allocate nutrients first after the fertilization, thus avoiding “wasting” valuable nutrients on unfertilized seeds, but the gymnosperms (conifers and allies) don’t. They allocate nutrients before the embryo is formed, and interestingly this is also the case in Hydatellaceae! What the implications of this finding are is not apparent yet, but one obvious possibility is that this is the plesiomorphic (primitive or original) condition among the flowering plants, later changed (lost) in all other flowering plants with the evolution of second fertilization (trigging the onset of the formation of the nutrition tissue), including Amborella, but still present in Hydatellaceae. And the easiest explanation for this pattern is that Nymphaeales is the sister to the rest of the flowering plants, with two “independent” origins of the second fertilization (one on the branch with the other members of the water lilies, one on the branch with all other flowering plants including Amborella). With Amborella as sister to the rest, three “independent” origins are needed, or we need to interpret the pre-fertilization nutrition tissue in Hydatellaceae as a truely unique feature, not really the same as in the gymnosperms (there are differences) but instead evolved from an ancestor with second fertilization, something that is not easily explained. The next logic step from here will be to describe and characterize the genetic system behind this feature, and compare it with the other early branching angiosperms as well as the gymnosperms. The evo-devo people are probably already working hard with it!
Last week a two years journey finally reached its end. It started springtime 2006, with Aberia tristis (i.e., Dovyalis zeyheri, Flacourtiaceae), the first of the then estimated 4900 type specimens that was to be included in our part of the African Plants Initiative. It ended last Thursday, when I scanned the 7881:st specimen, a Zygophyllum uitenhagense (i.e., Roepera maritima, Zygophyllaceae). Both specimens were collected by Christian Friedrich Ecklon (1795-1868) and Carl Ludwig Philipp Zeyher (1799-1858) in the Cape province of South Africa, probably in the 1820’s. Ecklon, a poor Danish pharmacist, and Zeyher, a German plant collector, are among the most prolific collectors of South African plants, and we have a very rich collection of their specimens here at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (more than 1500 of the 7900 scanned specimens were collected by them). It is their collections together with the collections of the contemporary Johann Franz Drège (1794-1881) and the later Rudolf Schlechter (1872-1925), that make up the bulk of our South African type specimens, and indeed the majority of our African types. In my virtual travel through Africa, I have met many more collectors, spanning three centuries from Peter Forsskål (1732-1763) to contemporary botanists like Marie Källersjö and PO Karis, and I have visited almost every contry on the continent (and many, many of the old colonies). I will miss some of these old men (and a few women)! Apart from learning a lot of old African colony geography, I have been quite good in reading old German hand writings. Now I must admit that I’m not sure how often I will need that particular knowledge…
For those of you reading Polish, there is a short report on the STJ homepage, written by Karolina, on last summers exploration in Burfjellet. I’m not sure what it says though… For those of you who, like me, don’t read Polish, but still want to now what we did last summer during our (almost) two week at Burfjellet, I have written two small texts (one in Swedish, one in English). Oh, almost forgot, this years mountain camp will take place at Burfjellet August 2 to 9! More information on thit great event can soon be found on the web pages of Norsk grotteforbund and Sveriges speleologförbund!
This years mountain-camp will be the perhaps most exiting area in Scandinavian caving right now, Burfjellet not far from Mo i Rana. It is an area known for many years, but it was not until the last few years that its potential became apparent! In 2006 the Polish cavers found a deep pitch, but lack of time forced them to turn at the top of pitch. Last year we returned for a 12 days stay on the mountain, and we manage making break-throughs in all three major caves (Edvardheimgrotta, Brattligrotta and Storligrotta), with the hundred meter deep pitch and waterfall in Edvardheimgrotta as the greatest discoveries. But we failed to connect the caves — so that remains to be done this summer! If you are interested in participating (first week of August), please feel free contact me, or check out the webpages of the Swedish Speleological Society or the Norwegian Speleological Society for news and information! Unfortunately I will not be there, I will go to Mongolia instead, but there will be cavers from Norway and Sweden and probably also Poland, UK, and perhaps also Hungary, and I’m sure it will be a great mountain camp! After last summer’s trip, I wrote a small travelogue for Norsk Grotteblad and Grottan, that I have translated to English. You can read it here!
This video from speleologas has everything you want from a music video! The lone man, smoking his waterpipe, heartbroken and teared by his miserable love to two women, a betrayed love, but also a happy end symbolized by wood chopping. But all this would only have been your average, we-have-seen-it-before-love-story, if it wasn’t for the setting! See it, listen to it, enjoy it! And then see it again! And again! And then see karabi and Spider. And then do something more useful.
(Many thanks Rolf for the tip!)
Jösses, det var inte det här jag hade tänkt mig när Xavier frågade om jag skulle hänga med till Mongoliet sommaren 2008, och jag mest på skämt sa javisst! Xavier träffade jag i köket/matsalen i Leirfjorden skole under fjolårets Tjorveuka, och jag vet inte hur det gick till när vi kom in på nästa års planer och Mongoliet dök upp. Egentligen var han på väg till Baltic Speleological Congress på Gotland, och väl där talade han om för alla att jag skulle med till Mongoliet. Därefter var det svårt att backa ur. Och backa ur ligger inte för mig, inte i praktiken även om jag många gånger har och kommer att önska att jag inte ska åka. Den här månaden till exempel, nu när nästan hela lönen gick åt till flygbiljetten och jag är skyldig min flickvän 2000 kr för att över huvud taget kunna överleva fram till lönen. Jag räknar dagarna, inte till den 20 juli då jag åker, utan till lönedagen. Men det är det värt, och definitivt en del av resan! Så nu måste jag på allvar läsa in mig i den lilla litteraturen som finns om de få kända grottorna i Mongoliet och geologin där. Samt biologin förstås. Och historia. Plus att jag måste köpa nya vandringskängor. Och kanske en ny kamera. Jag börjar ana att jag kommer att få leva rejält snålt ytterligare några månader.
BBC broadcasted this amazing and really stunning documentary yesterday (April 1, 2008)! Watch it and see for yourself if you ever (as I did for many years) doubted that penguins are birds!
Otroligt! DN har börjat kalla de hålorna medlemmar ur den numera vittkända ryska domedagssekten tänkte vänta ut jordens undergånd i för just det de är: hålor! Detta efter att länge ha skrivit grottor (tillsammans med till exempel Aftonbladet (medan Aftonbladet TV helt riktigt talar om en bunker och förstör lite av min indignation!), SvD, Metro, SVT och säkert flera). Men rekordet slår kanske Sveriges speleologförbunds ordförande som borde veta bättre än under att under en intervju i Magnusson i P1 (27 mars, ca tio min in i programmet) “för sakens skull” går med på att kalla hålorna för grottor! Hallå Thomaz, du missade just en jättechans att sprida upplysning om underjorden (om nu inte det är en motsägelse vill sägas…)! Däremot var fortifikationsverkets representant Karl-Martin Svärd noga med att kalla deras bergrum för just berganläggningar och inte grottor (och av exakt den rätta anledningen, att grottor är naturliga medan bunkrar, gruvor och berganläggningar är tillverkade). För övrigt kan tilläggas att Usama bin Ladin knappast gömmer sig i grottor, utan snarare i bunkrar! Även om ihopblandningen ledde till en omfattande bibliografi över grottor i Afghanistan…
OK, jag måste erkänna att också jag tycker att finns viktigare saker att ägna energi åt än att bli upprörd över att journalister och telegramförfattare inte hinner ägna mer tanke åt sina nyhetstexter än att de inte förstår vad de skriver om, eller att SSF:s ordförande väljer den lätta vägen, men ord och språkbruk är viktiga.
Sometimes you find yourself in the most strange places… (the fun(niest) starts somewhere here)
|
|